USPTO serial 88562231
CYBELLEZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBELLEZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shenzhen, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Barrettes; False hair; Hair accessories, namely, hair sticks; Hair accessories, namely, plastic styling inserts that create height and volume on the crown of the head; Hair bands; Hair barrettes; Hair chopsticks; Hair clamps; Hair clips; Hair extensions; Hair grips; Hair nets; Hair netting; Hair pieces; Hair pieces and wigs; Hair ribbons; Hair rods; Hair scrunchies; Hair weaves; Human braiding hair; Human hair; Human hair for making wigs and hair pieces; Human hair for use as wigs and hair pieces; Ribbons for the hair; Rubber bands for hair; Synthetic braiding hair; Wig caps; Wigs; Wigs, hairpieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |