Drawing for PRESTO

USPTO serial 88564931

PRESTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRESTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Pampalone

Michael Pampalone Pampalone Law6695 BroadwayMerrillville, IN 46410United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable or recorded computer software in the field of application and database integration which perform the function of library management, knowledge management, portal development, and online research analytics applications, namely, the organization, classification, indexing, and the facilitation of access to information resources as well as the integration and usage tracking of multiple digital resources, namely, graphics, e-mails, photographs, as well as third party databases and applicationsACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for application and database integration which perform the function of library management, knowledge management, portal development and online research analytics applications, namely, the organization, classification, indexing and the facilitation of access to information resources as well as the integration and usage tracking of multiple digital resources, namely, graphics, e-mails, photographs as well as third party database and applications; Computer support services, namely, installation, maintenance and updating of computer software in respect of the foregoingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 16, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 15, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 31, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 17, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 19, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2024ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2024GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2024GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2024CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 12, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 6, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2023ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2022GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2022GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2022CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 28, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 20, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 20, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2022ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 8, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 7, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 14, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 6, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 5, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2020ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
May 5, 2020EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
May 5, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 5, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance