USPTO serial 88567252
STAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, JUSTIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with STAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dyan House
Dyan House BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP1900 N. Pearl Street, Suite 1500SUITE 5000Dallas, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable artificial intelligence (AI) software for data analysis, pattern discovery, process automation, contextual prediction, predictive analytics, predictive modeling, recognition, classification, segmentation, regression, decision support and visualization in relation to product and service standards as well as standards development and testing; downloadable computer software for data analysis, pattern discovery, process automation, contextual prediction, predictive analytics, predictive modeling, recognition, classification, segmentation, regression, decision support and visualization in relation to product and service standards as well as standards development and testing; all of the foregoing in connection with standards development, testing, inspection and certification | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Computer database management services; analyzing and compiling business data; market analysis; artificial intelligence based market analysis services; business management analysis; business data analysis; marketing analysis services; all of the foregoing in connection with standards development, testing, inspection and certification | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing user access to data stored electronically in central files and on-line platform in relation to product and service standards; all of the foregoing in connection with standards development, testing, inspection and certification | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, training services in the field of computer software; all of the foregoing in connection with standards development, testing, inspection and certification | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research and development of compilation of standards and standards development related services; development of safety, ethics, and efficiency standards for others in the field of artificial intelligence; implementation of standards for others, namely testing, analysis, and evaluation in the field of artificial intelligence to determine conformity with established safety, ethics, and efficiency standards; evaluation of the goods and services of others to comply with safety, ethics, and efficiency standards in the field of artificial intelligence; facilitation services, namely the facilitation of standards products relating to the development and setting of standards in the field of artificial intelligence; technical support services in the form of troubleshooting of computer software problems; operation of online artificial intelligence (AI) platform, namely maintaining and providing downloadable software featuring artificial intelligence for determining and assessing product and services standards as well as standards development and testing in relation to product and service standards as well as standards development and testing; all of the foregoing in connection with standards development, testing, inspection and certification | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Licensing of software, licensing of intellectual property, and licensing of technology in relation to product and service standards as well as standards development and testing; all of the foregoing in connection with standards development, testing, inspection and certification | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Canadian Standards Association
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named STAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |