USPTO serial 88567324
GUMBROOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GUMBROOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Châteauguay, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell E. Radin
Mitchell E. Radin ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUETHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for cleaning interior and exterior floors, rugs and surfaces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |