Drawing for BETTER SAFE THAN HUNGRY

USPTO serial 88570288

BETTER SAFE THAN HUNGRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ADEBAYO, OMOLAYO E.
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETTER SAFE THAN HUNGRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan LA Phillips

Jonathan LA Phillips Phillips & Bathke, P.C.300 Northeast Perry AvenuePeoria, IL 61603United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Processed nut-based snack bars containing eggs; Processed nut-based snack bars containing eggs and collagen; Cheese-based snack foods, namely, processed dried snack puffs containing eggs and collagen; Processed fruit- and nut-based snack bars; Processed fruit-and nut-based food bars for boosting energy; Nut and seed-based snack bars; Nut and seed-based snack bars for boosting energy; Nut-based snack bars; Nut-based snack bars for boosting energy; Nut- and dried fruit-based snack bars; Nut-and dried fruit-based snack bars for boosting energyACTIVE—
030Processed granola-based snack bars containing eggs; Processed cereal based energy bars containing eggs; Processed cereal based energy bars containing eggs and collagen; Cereal bars; High-protein cereal bars; Ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; grain based food bars; high protein processed cereal to be used as breakfast food, snack, or ingredient for making other foodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 10, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 29, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2021NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2021TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 7, 2021PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2021PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 13, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 11, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 24, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance