Drawing for CITYSWITCH

USPTO serial 88571076

CITYSWITCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6325115Status 702Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 20, 2021
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 702: Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use.

Need help with CITYSWITCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,795*

Plus Government fees of $1,625

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM M. ELLARD

WILLIAM M. ELLARD CUSHING, MORRIS, ARMBRUSTER & MONTGOMERY, LLP1150 Spring St NWSuite 300ATLANTA, GA 30309

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035services with respect to development for others of infrastructure for wireless communication networks, namely, business project management services for projects of construction and installation of such infrastructure; services with respect to development for others of infrastructure for wireless communication networks, namely, procurement and negotiation of business contracts for others to acquire for others rights to such infrastructure, particularly rights as an owner and rights of use under leases and co-location and joint-use arrangements for business purposesACTIVESep 25, 2015
037services with respect to development for others of infrastructure for wireless communication networks, namely, selection for others of real estate sites for such infrastructureACTIVESep 25, 2015
038as agent or broker, on behalf of lessors, leasing wireless communication network equipment, namely, towers, poles, and platforms as infrastructure for wireless communication networks as a part of co-location and joint-use arrangementsACTIVESep 25, 2015
042development for others of infrastructure for wireless communication networks; development for others of infrastructure for communications and signaling networks for railroad operations which infrastructure allows for joint-use facilitiesACTIVESep 25, 2015
045services with respect to development for others of infrastructure for wireless communication networks, namely, obtaining zoning and other governmental permits for constructing and developing such infrastructureACTIVESep 25, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2026NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2026C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 19, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 18, 2026E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2026REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2023AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 20, 2021R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 2, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 13, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2020UNTDREQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN—
Dec 29, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 28, 2020PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2020INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Dec 16, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 27, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2020GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2020GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2020EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Nov 27, 2020CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Oct 25, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 25, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 25, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 20, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2020RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Oct 18, 2020RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2020RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Oct 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2020RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Aug 16, 2020RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2020RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jul 28, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 26, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 3, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance