USPTO serial 88571942
SMART TRAINING TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMART TRAINING TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M. COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUETHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | simulation software in the fields of operation of cranes, piloting of construction equipment, piloting of robotic vehicles, piloting of underwater vehicles, piloting of military vehicles, and operation of drilling rigs; training simulators for the operation of cranes, the piloting of construction equipment, the piloting of robotic vehicles, the piloting of underwater vehicles, the piloting of military vehicles, and the operation of drilling rigs; simulation software for training purposes in the field of the operation of cranes, the piloting of construction equipment, the piloting of robotic vehicles, the piloting of underwater vehicles, the piloting of military vehicles, and the operation of drilling rigs; simulators in the nature of computer hardware and software-based teaching apparatus for the operation of cranes, the piloting of construction equipment, the piloting of robotic vehicles, the piloting of underwater vehicles, the piloting of military vehicles, and the operation of drilling rigs; training apparatus and simulators for the operation of cranes, the piloting of construction equipment, the piloting of robotic vehicles, the piloting of underwater vehicles, the piloting of military vehicles, and the operation of drilling rigs; vehicle drive training simulators; vehicle driving training simulators; training services provided via simulators for training in the operation of cranes, the piloting of construction equipment, the piloting of robotic vehicles, the piloting of underwater vehicles, the piloting of military vehicles, and the operation of drilling rigs; computer-based simulation training services as to the operation of cranes, the piloting of construction equipment, the piloting of robotic vehicles, the piloting of underwater vehicles, the piloting of military vehicles, and the operation of drilling rigs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |