USPTO serial 88572273
SPARKX5
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPARKX5?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dorval, QC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
James R Menker HOLLEY & MENKER, PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in tracking, measuring and promoting employee mental well-being and preventing mental health issues | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 31, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |