USPTO serial 88572691
NORTHERN LIGHTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NORTHERN LIGHTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank Robison
Frank Robison FRANK ROBISON LAW LLC2043 BUCHANAN PTLAFAYETTE, CO 33957UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cannabis Sativa L and its derivatives and preparations, namely, essential oils from hemp, terpenes as essential oils, e-cigarette liquids comprised of essential oils and cosmetics ingredients and goods none of which in this Class include Cannabis sativa L, or any oils, extracts or derivatives thereof, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2018 |
| 004 | Cannabis Sativa L and its derivatives and preparations, namely, industrial oils, greases, oils for use in the manufacture and maintenance of other products, industrial and household oils and lubricants, all of the aforementioned using plant extracts or plant material and none of which include Cannabis sativa L or any oils, extracts or derivatives thereof, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content of more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2018 |
| 029 | Cannabis Sativa L and its derivatives and preparations, namely edible hemp oil, edible oils and fats, edible hemp seed oil, processed edible seeds for snacks, seed-based snack foods, with none of the aforementioned goods in this Class comprised of Cannabis Sativa L, or any oils, extracts of derivatives thereof, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and none of which are comprised of more than a naturally occurring trace amount of cannabidiol (CBD) | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2018 |
| 030 | Processed edible seeds for use as seasonings and flavorings in foods and beverages with none of the aforementioned goods in this Class comprised of Cannabis Sativa L, or any oils, extracts or derivatives thereof, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and none of which are comprised of more than a naturally occurring trace amount of cannabidiol (CBD) | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AL Trading LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NORTHERN LIGHTS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |