Drawing for ECOMILL

USPTO serial 88572764

ECOMILL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOMILL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ethan Horwitz

Ethan Horwitz CARLTON FIELDS, PAPO Box 3239Attn: IP DepartmentTampa, FL 33601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Agricultural machinery, namely, coffee bean washing machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 27, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 15, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 15, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2022EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2022EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 11, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2021EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2021EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 6, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 11, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 16, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 14, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 21, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2019MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance