USPTO serial 88573025
COMPOSTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NASSERGHODSI, SAHAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMPOSTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY M ANDERSON
GARY M ANDERSON FULWIDER PATTON LLP6100 CENTER DRIVE SUITE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Pouches and rigid containers all made from kraft paper and kraft board for packaging use in the food service industry; Plastic pouches and films all made from bio-resin for use in the food service industry for packaging; Rigid containers consisting primarily of kraft paper, kraft board and also including bio-resin, for packaging use in the food service industry; all aforementioned goods being compostable | ACTIVE | Mar 5, 2020 |
| 020 | Plastic rigid containers made from bio-resin for use in the food service industry; Rigid containers consisting primarily of a bio-resin plastic substitute and also including kraft paper and kraft board, for packaging use in the food service industry; all aforementioned goods being compostable | ACTIVE | Mar 5, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 30, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |