USPTO serial 88573857
GRATOMIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- QUEEN, ESTHER FELICIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRATOMIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A LaVine
Jordan A LaVine FLASTER GREENBERG P.C.1835 MARKET STREETSUITE 1050PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Natural graphite; Natural graphite for industrial purposes; Graphite; Graphite for industrial purposes; Graphene; Graphene for industrial purposes; Industrial minerals; Unprocessed polymers; Polymers and polymeric additives; Elastomers and polymer products; Unprocessed thermoplastic compounds, thermoplastic elastomer resins and thermoplastic concentrates for manufacturing; Polymers, biopolymers, polymeric additives and biopolymeric additives for use in the manufacture of industrial products, consumer and household products, sealants and packaging; Thermoplastic elastomer resins in pellet form for use in further manufacture; Unprocessed artificial resins as raw materials in the form of powders, liquids or pastes; Chemical preparations for industrial purposes; Graphite for batteries; Battery electrolytes; Graphite compounds for tires | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Lubricants; Graphite lubricants | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Ores of metal and their alloys | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Graphite electrodes; Rechargeable batteries; Batteries and battery chargers | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Tires for vehicles; Tire liners; Tire compounds | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Shirts; t-shirts; sweaters; sweatshirts; jackets; coats; hats; caps being headwear; scarves; clothing, namely, tops and bottoms | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Commercial consultancy; Commercial management; Commercialization services for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Mining extraction; Mining of graphite; Mineral extraction | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Mineral refining and processing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of mining exploration and extraction; Mining exploration and extraction services; Mineral exploration and extraction services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gratomic Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GRATOMIC
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |