Drawing for UMAMI FRIES

USPTO serial 88575035

UMAMI FRIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UMAMI FRIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leon G Rendeiro Jr

Leon G Rendeiro Jr Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, P.A.1715 Monroe StreetFt. Myers, FL 33902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant servicesACTIVENov 1, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2022MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 7, 2022ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 6, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2021ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 9, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 6, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 8, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 1, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 11, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 15, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance