USPTO serial 88575934
HAIR BIONIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAW, CHRISTOPHER M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAIR BIONIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | 3-in-1 hair conditioners; 3-in-1 hair shampoos; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic hair dressing preparations; Cosmetic hair filling spray for covering bald and thinning spots on the scalp; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic preparations; Cosmetic preparations for bath and shower; Cosmetic preparations for baths; Cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetics; Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Cosmetics in the form of milks, lotions and emulsions; Hair care products, namely, heat protection sprays; Hair care creams; Hair care lotions; Hair care preparations; Hair products, namely, thickening control creams; Hair sprays and hair gels; Hair balsam; Hair bleach; Hair bleaches; Hair butter; Hair cleaning preparations; Hair color; Hair color pens; Hair color removers; Hair colorants; Hair coloring preparations; Hair colourants; Hair colouring; Hair colouring and dyes; Hair colouring preparations; Hair conditioner; Hair conditioners; Hair creams; Hair curling preparations; Hair decolorants; Hair detangler preparations; Hair dressings for men; Hair dressings for women; Hair dye; Hair dyes; Hair emollients; Hair fixers; Hair frosts; Hair gel; Hair gel and hair mousse; Hair gels; Hair glaze; Hair glitter; Hair highlighting spray; Hair lacquers; Hair lighteners; Hair lotion; Hair lotions; Hair mascara; Hair mousse; Hair mousses; Hair nourishers; Hair oils; Hair pomades; Hair relaxers; Hair relaxing preparations; Hair rinses; Hair rinses; Hair shampoo; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hair sheen spray; Hair spray; Hair sprays; Hair stick pomades; Hair straightening preparations; Hair styling gel; Hair styling preparations; Hair styling spray; Hair texture cream; Hair texturizers; Hair tonic; Hair tonics; Hair waving lotion; Hair waving preparations; Hair wax; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Collagen preparations for cosmetic purposes; Collagen preparations for cosmetics purposes; Gels for cosmetic purposes; Heat protectant sprays for hair; Non-foaming cosmetic preparations for hair; Non-medicated cosmetics; Non-medicated hair serums; Non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; Non-medicated preparations all for the care of skin, hair and scalp; Nutritional oils for cosmetic purposes; Oil baths for hair care; Oils for cosmetic purposes; Oils for hair conditioning; Pomades for hair for cosmetic purposes; Preparations for setting hair; Styling sprays for Hair styling spray; Styling clay for hair; Styling foam for hair; Styling paste for hair; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hirsch, Mindy L
- Other trademarks owned by Hirsch, Mindy L
- Other trademarks owned by Hirsch, Daniel C
- Other trademarks owned by Hirsch, Daniel C
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named HAIR BIONIX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2021 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |