Drawing for BINNY

USPTO serial 88576013

BINNY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BINNY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brett Albert Schenck

Brett Albert Schenck SCHENCK LAW OFFICE49 SOUTH LADUE ESTATES DRIVECREVE COEUR, MO 63141UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014JewelryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2020NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2020DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 27, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 7, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 7, 2020DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2020ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance