Drawing for BEAUTIVISION

USPTO serial 88576796

BEAUTIVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAUTIVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Major

Scott J. Major MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN, PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD., 14TH FLOORARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009accessory for smart phones in the nature of computer hardware for capturing ultraviolet light images; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for displaying ultraviolet light images to show the ultraviolet impact on human skin and for recommending products to protect the skinACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 17, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 10, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 21, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 5, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 5, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2019GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 18, 2019GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 18, 2019CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance