USPTO serial 88576942
LVDC LAS VEGAS DISSEMINATION COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WITKOWSKI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LVDC LAS VEGAS DISSEMINATION COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James P. Chrisman, Esq.
8924 SPANISH RIDGE AVENUELAS VEGAS, NV 89148UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | gaming software and hardware for worldwide pari-mutuel betting and gaming, namely, computers, video monitors, printers, and interactive stand-alone computerized kiosks for gaming | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | gaming and pari-mutuel business administration services, namely, registration, transcription, composition, compilation, and systemization of written communications and registrations, and exploitation or compilation of mathematical or statistical data for profit survey and business management analysis purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing online pari-mutual and gaming services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Las Vegas Dissemination, Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LVDC LAS VEGAS DISSEMINATION COMPANY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | RSHG | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING - GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | TRMS | TEAS REQUEST TO MAKE SPECIAL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |