USPTO serial 88576973
WRATH OF KONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 20, 2020
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with WRATH OF KONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $425
Owner
ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
NORTH RYDE, NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
NORTH RYDE, NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
NORTH RYDE, NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEANINE M. MITCHELL
JEANINE M. MITCHELL Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.10220 Aristocrat WayLas Vegas, NV 89135United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of providing a web-based system, on-line portal and social networking platform, for customers to participate in online electronic gaming in a social casino environment; providing on-line non-downloadable gaming software for users to engage in online electronic gaming in a virtual environment; providing temporary use of non-downloadable game software featuring games played on computers, hand held devices, mobile and wireless communication devices, and internet enabled devices; providing temporary use of non-downloadable game software featuring games played via global computer network and online social networks | ACTIVE | Sep 12, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WRATH OF KONG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 20, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 16, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2020 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 4, 2020 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |