Drawing for SPEEDPARTS

USPTO serial 88577180

SPEEDPARTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HESIK, APRIL ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPEEDPARTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan Optican Herman

Joan Optican Herman HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 MASTIN BLVD., SUITE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Aircraft repair and maintenance parts replacement program, namely, distributorship services in the field of maintenance replacement parts for aircraft; aircraft repair and maintenance parts replacement program, namely, distributorship services in the field of maintenance replacement parts for aircraft under a maintenance plan contractACTIVE—
036Aircraft repair and maintenance parts replacement program, namely, maintenance service plans for aircraft replacement parts billed on a contractual basisACTIVE—
037Aircraft repair and maintenance parts replacement program, namely, installing replacement parts in aircraft; aircraft repair and maintenance parts replacement program, namely, installing parts under a maintenance plan contractACTIVE—
039Aircraft repair and maintenance parts replacement program, namely, delivery of maintenance replacement parts for aircraft; aircraft repair and maintenance parts replacement program, namely, delivery of maintenance replacement parts for aircraft under a maintenance plan contractACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 12, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 4, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance