Drawing for PROSPEED

USPTO serial 88577199

PROSPEED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HESIK, APRIL ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROSPEED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan Optican Herman

Joan Optican Herman HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 MASTIN BLVD., SUITE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Aircraft maintenance management services, namely, administrative services in the nature of scheduling and managing the maintenance and inspection requirements for aircraft of others; aircraft maintenance management services, namely, administrative maintenance tracking services in the nature of scheduling and reporting on the due dates for maintenance and inspection of aircraft for others required by regulation; aircraft maintenance management services, namely, collection and analysis of status and condition data, and providing aircraft maintenance scheduling recommendations based thereon; aircraft maintenance management services, namely, maintenance shop business management services in the nature of managing and reporting on the due dates for maintenance and inspection required by regulationACTIVE—
037Maintenance of aircraft; providing information regarding aircraft maintenanceACTIVE—
042Remote monitoring of the functioning and use of aircraft of others to determine maintenance requirementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 8, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 18, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance