USPTO serial 88577492
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY H. BROWN
JEFFREY H. BROWN MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDICH LLP444 W. LAKE ST., STE. 3200CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting public awareness of the benefits of solar energy; Providing consumer and business information in the field of solar energy; Providing information in the field of energy efficiency | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | Providing information in the field of financing of solar energy systems; Providing financing information and economic viability information in the field of solar energy systems and installations. Providing information in the field of financing of energy systems; providing financing information and economic viability information in the field of energy systems and installations | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Installation of solar energy systems for residential and commercial use; Consulting services in the field of technical planning and technical project management of the installation of solar installations for generating, distributing and supplying electricity from solar energy systems; Installation of energy systems for residential and commercial use | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Design and engineering of solar energy systems; Consulting services in the field of design and technology planning in the nature of technology project management of installations for generating, distributing and supplying electricity from solar energy systems; Design and engineering of energy systems | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 16, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 16, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |