USPTO serial 88577516
ACAI SPLIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNABB, SANDRA MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACAI SPLIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VICTOR K SAPPHIRE
VICTOR K SAPPHIRE LAW OFFICE OF VICTOR SAPPHIRE7190 SUNSET BLVD STE 116LOS ANGELES, CA 90046UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Dessert puddings; Fruit coulis; Fruit ice; Fruit ices; Fruit sauces; Edible fruit ices; Frozen confections; Frozen dessert consisting of fruit and cream or cream substitutes; Frozen yogurt confections; Non-dairy frozen confections; Vegan frozen confections | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2021 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 6, 2021 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 6, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |