Drawing for Serial No. 88578623

USPTO serial 88578623

Serial No. 88578623

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 88578623?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN C SEREBOFF

STEVEN C SEREBOFF SOCAL IP LAW GROUP LLP310 N WESTLAKE BLVD SUITE 120WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91362UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Pre-mixed alcoholic beverages, other than beer-basedACTIVEMay 2, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 24, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 24, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 10, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 2, 2020RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Aug 12, 2020GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2020GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2020CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 7, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 7, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 7, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 18, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 18, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 20, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance