USPTO serial 88580280
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Z. Peter Sawicki
Z. Peter Sawicki WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KOEHLER, P.A.121 South Eighth Street, Suite 1100Minneapolis, MN 55402United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Plastics in extruded form for use in further manufacturing of windows; Extruded PVC product used to produce frames, sashes and accessories for use in the manufacture of windows; Vinyl extrusions used in the manufacture of windows; rubber end caps | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 12, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |