USPTO serial 88582254
Serial No. 88582254
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GALANTE, JOSHUA MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 88582254?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Maryland Heights, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shen Wang
203 N LASALLE ST SUITE 2100CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | User interfaces, namely, an electric control panel for electrotechnical and electronic devices; Computer hardware for controlling an electronic muscle stimulation system; Downloadable computer programs for user interface design; Electric control devices for controlling an electronic muscle stimulation system; Electric control panels; Electrical controllers; Electrical controlling devices; Electronic control circuits for an electronic muscle stimulation system; Electronic controllers for an electronic muscle stimulation system; Programmable electronic controllers for an electronic muscle stimulation system; Remote control telemetering machines and apparatus; Remote controls for an electronic muscle stimulation system; Wireless controllers to monitor and control the functioning of other electronic devices; Wireless controllers to remotely monitor and control the function and status of other electrical, electronic, and mechanical devices or systems, namely, an electronic muscle stimulation system for pain relief | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2014 |
| 010 | Massage apparatus; Massage apparatus; Massage apparatus and instruments; Massage apparatus for massaging head, neck, shoulder, elbow, hip, forearm, chest, arm, hand, palm, wrist, thumb, finger, knee, leg, foot, thigh, shin, toe, calf, ankle, and heel.; Massaging apparatus for personal use; Vibromassage apparatus; Vibromassage devices; Electric massage apparatus for household use; Electrical stimulation apparatus for nerves, muscles, skin for physical therapy, rehabilitative and pain management purposes; Electromedical rehabilitative and pain management products for clinical and home use, namely, electrical nerve and muscle stimulators, ultrasonic stimulators, magnet therapy stimulators and laser therapy stimulators; Electronic stimulation apparatus for head, neck, shoulder, elbow, hip, forearm, chest, arm, hand, palm, wrist, thumb, finger, knee, leg, foot, thigh, shin, toe, calf, ankle, and heel for physical therapy purposes; Electrotherapy devices for providing transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, infrared heat and compression; Foot massage apparatus; Nerve stimulator apparatus; Therapeutic apparatus, namely, body limb thermal compression undergarments for relief of muscular and joint pain through targeted thermal application and compression | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2020 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 21, 2020 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |