USPTO serial 88583792
BAFANG DUMPLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARER, KATERINA DOROTHY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BAFANG DUMPLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.4000 LEGATO ROADSUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Broth; Charcuterie; Food prepared from fish, namely, stuffing consisting predominantly of fish, and fish balls; Meat; Peanuts, processed; Soya milk; Tofu; Soups; Tripe; Eggs; Vegetable soup preparations; Fruit jellies, not being confectionary; peanut milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Pastries, namely, pasties; Chinese steamed dumplings (shumai cooked); Flour-based dumplings; Chinese stuffed dumplings (gyoza, cooked); Sago; Frozen, prepared and packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; Noodles and sauce mixes combined in unitary packages; Instant noodles; Noodles; Spring rolls; Dough; Cakes; Tapioca; Eight treasures porridge, namely, rice based porridge containing beans; Radish cake; Seasonings; Stuffing mixes containing bread; Tea; Iced tea; Tea-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Aerated water; Fruit juices; mineral water; Syrups for flavoring food or beverages; Beverages, namely, vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Consulting services in the field of commercial administration of the licensing of the goods and services of others; Commercial information agency services; Commercial and industrial management assistance; Marketing services; Providing television home shopping services in the field of general consumer merchandise | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurants; Restaurant services; Self-service restaurants; Food and drink catering; Snack-bars services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAFANG YUNJI (SAMOA) INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named BAFANG DUMPLING
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |