Drawing for BRIDGIT BENCH

USPTO serial 88583958

BRIDGIT BENCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BRIDGIT BENCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan Feeney

Alan Feeney PCK IP Lawyers (USA) P.C1717 Pennsylvania Avenue North WestSuite 1025Washington, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a Services (SaaS), namely, a web-based computer software application for use by operations managers and individuals within the Human Resources team in the construction industry field which allows users to enter project information, on site locations and role requirements within the construction industry workforceACTIVEMay 13, 2019

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 17, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 17, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 1, 2022GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2022GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2022CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 28, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 25, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2022ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2021GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2021GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2021CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2021GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2021GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2021CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 20, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 5, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 20, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance