USPTO serial 88585321
SIGRID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 27, 2020
- Examiner
- HSU, FONG
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SIGRID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $850
Owner
Software Improvement Group B.V.
Amsterdam, NL
Software Improvement Group B.V.
Amsterdam, NL
Software Improvement Group B.V.
Destelbergen, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl L. Burbach
Cheryl L. Burbach Erise IP, P.A.7015 College Blvd.Suite 700Overland Park, KS 66211Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing user access to platforms on the Internet; Telecommunications, namely, electronic transmission of data, messages and information between computers, mobile devices and wireless communications apparatus; providing access to computer databases in the field of business networking; Providing of telecommunications facilities for sharing information; Transmission of database information via telecommunications networks; Information, advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Quality and risk consultancy and analysis in connection with computer software systems; Platform as a Service (PaaS) for software assurance, including software quality, architecture, security, privacy, software economics, dependency and risk analysis; Design and development of computer hardware and software; Computer services, namely, application service provider for software quality, architecture, security, privacy, software economics, dependency and risk analysis; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for software quality, architecture, security, privacy, software economics, dependency and risk analysis; design and development of customer-specific websites for software quality, architecture, security, privacy, software economics, dependency and risk analysis; Computer services, namely, on-line personalized information services for software quality, architecture, security, privacy, software economics, dependency and risk analysis; Providing the use of online non-downloadable software for software quality, architecture, security, privacy, software economics, dependency and risk analysis; Design and development of computer software for others; Information, advice and consultancy relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Software Improvement Group B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Software Improvement Group B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Software Improvement Group B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SIGRID
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |