Drawing for URBAN GREEN

USPTO serial 88588055

URBAN GREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NASSERGHODSI, SAHAR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with URBAN GREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRANCIS JOHN CIARAMELLA

FRANCIS JOHN CIARAMELLA FRANCIS JOHN CIARAMELLA, PLLC110 FRONT STREET, SUITE 300JUPITER, FL 33477UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Towels; Wrapping cloth for general purposes; Children's towels; Cotton base mixed fabrics; Cotton fabric; Kitchen towels; Washcloths; all of the foregoing goods made from environmentally friendly materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 29, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 29, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 15, 2021EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 25, 2021GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 25, 2021GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 25, 2021CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 16, 2020GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 16, 2020GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 16, 2020CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 10, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 10, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 11, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 11, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance