USPTO serial 88588468
CANNALOVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 2023
- Examiner
- KLUWE, CHERYL D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with CANNALOVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ConSeal International Incorporated
Norwood, MA
Other trademarks owned by ConSeal International Incorporated
ConSeal International Incorporated
Norwood, MA
Other trademarks owned by ConSeal International Incorporated
ConSeal International Incorporated
Norwood, MA
Other trademarks owned by ConSeal International Incorporated
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James David Johnson
James David Johnson JOHNSON & MARTIN, P.A.500 WEST CYPRESS CREEK ROADSUITE 430FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives for food manufacturing, the foregoing containing cannabis derived solely from hemp seeds with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis and not containing any CBD | ACTIVE | Jul 4, 2018 |
| 003 | Non-medicated shampoo; skin and body topical lotions and creams for cosmetic use; non-medicated skin serums; non-medicated face and body washes; all of the foregoing containing cannabis derived solely from hemp seeds with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | Jul 4, 2018 |
| 031 | Beverages for animals, the foregoing containing cannabis derived solely from hemp seeds with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, and not containing any CBD | ACTIVE | Jul 4, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ConSeal International Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by ConSeal International Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by ConSeal International Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named CANNALOVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2023 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2023 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2022 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2022 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 30, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2021 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2021 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 24, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |