USPTO serial 88589288
AIRDOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRDOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia K. Sutherland
Julia K. Sutherland Seyfarth Shaw LLP233 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 8000Chicago, IL 60606-6448United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land vehicles, hover vehicles, magnetic levitation vehicles and aircraft; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water, namely, magnetic levitation trains, magnetic levitation vehicles, magnetic levitation pods, vehicles that travel in a vacuum or partial vacuum within an enclosed tube, trains that travel in a vacuum or partial vacuum within an enclosed tube, pods that travel in a vacuum or partial vacuum within an enclosed tube, locomotives; freight trains; passenger trains; railway freight cars; railway passenger cars | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Transportation logistics management services, namely, planning and coordinating transportation of cargo; Business operation services relating to operation of transportation vehicles and systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Construction, installation and maintenance of transportation vehicles and systems; Building construction; installation services for vehicles, trains, vehicle pods, magnetic levitation pods, magnetic levitation systems, vacuum systems, vacuum and partial vacuum transportation tubes, computer hardware; providing repair information for vehicles, trains, vehicle pods, magnetic levitation pods, magnetic levitation systems, vacuum systems, vacuum and partial vacuum transportation tubes, computer hardware; repair services for vehicles, trains, vehicle pods, magnetic levitation pods, magnetic levitation systems, vacuum systems, vacuum and partial vacuum transportation tubes, computer hardware; machinery maintenance and repair; maintenance and repair services for vehicles, trains, vehicle pods, magnetic levitation pods, magnetic levitation systems, vacuum systems, vacuum and partial vacuum transportation tubes, computer hardware; pipeline installation and repair; pump repair or maintenance; repair of axles for vehicles; repair of industrial machinery; repair of land vehicles; repair of ventilating apparatus; vehicle repair and maintenance; vehicle repair consultancy; warehouse construction and repair | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Transportation services, namely, high-speed transportation of passengers and goods; Transportation services, namely, high-speed transportation of passengers and goods in tubes; Consulting and advisory services in the field of transportation; Providing a website featuring information in the field of transportation; Providing information in the field of transportation; Online transportation reservation services; travel arrangement, namely, arranging the transportation of passengers and goods; Supply chain logistics services consisting of the transport and warehousing of goods, and transportation of cargo via land and water; Transportation management services, namely, arranging the transport of travelers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Research, development, engineering, design, and testing services in the field of transportation; Research, development, engineering, design, and testing of transportation vehicles and systems; Consulting and advisory services in the field of engineering; Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of magnetic levitation trains, magnetic levitation vehicles, magnetic levitation pods, vehicles that travel in a vacuum or partial vacuum within an enclosed tube, trains that travel in a vacuum or partial vacuum within an enclosed tube, pods that travel in a vacuum or partial vacuum within an enclosed tube; industrial analysis and research services in the field of magnetic levitation trains, magnetic levitation vehicles, magnetic levitation pods, vehicles that travel in a vacuum or partial vacuum within an enclosed tube, trains that travel in a vacuum or partial vacuum within an enclosed tube, pods that travel in a vacuum or partial vacuum within an enclosed tube; design and development of computer hardware and software; conducting engineering feasibility studies in the field of magnetic levitation trains, magnetic levitation vehicles, magnetic levitation pods, vehicles that travel in a vacuum or partial vacuum within an enclosed tube, trains that travel in a vacuum or partial vacuum within an enclosed tube, pods that travel in a vacuum or partial vacuum within an enclosed tube; computer software repair; computer software installation services; providing computer software repair information; computer software repair services; computer software maintenance and repair services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hyperloop Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hyperloop Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AIRDOCK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 8, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 20, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 20, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 2, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 5, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 30, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |