USPTO serial 88592353
CRISP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SABAGH, LAILA TAREK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRISP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric Jeppsen
ERIC JEPPSEN BTJD3165 E. MILLROCK DRIVESUITE 500SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84093Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for processing and tracking payments and point of sale transactions in the hospitality and restaurant industry; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for food inventory tracking and management in the hospitality and restaurant industry; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing employees, namely, for performing task management, for providing inspection checklists, for providing employee information, for employee scheduling, for tracking employee time and attendance, and for delivering employee announcements; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for ordering, paying for, and tracking food delivery; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for digital menu content management and for use in creating and displaying digital menus in the hospitality and restaurant industry; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for making and processing payment transactions with gift cards and vouchers; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for implementing a restaurant rewards program; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in facilitating, operating, and managing customer relations and loyalty and reward programs; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software featuring a dashboard for visualization of customer data, financial data, and business performance data in the hospitality and restaurant industry; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software featuring a dashboard for engaging in data analytics in the hospitality and restaurant industry; designing and developing websites and digital menus for others in the hospitality and restaurant industry | ACTIVE | Apr 2, 2018 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |