USPTO serial 88593000
IBS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, AHSEN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IBS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scarborough, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A.W. Wong
David A.W. Wong BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 SOUTH MERIDIAN STREETINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3535United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | pre-fabricated wall assemblies for use in constructing interior and exterior building envelopes | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | custom manufacturing and installation of pre-fabricated wall assemblies for use in constructing interior and exterior building envelopes, and technical consulting services in the aforementioned fields | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 10, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |