USPTO serial 88593395
CITYVIBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DICKSON, RACHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CITYVIBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Kraus
ANDREW KRAUS OPTICLIFF LAW, LLC123 FREE ST. STE 200PORTLAND, ME 04101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile applications for enabling users to find local events and places by search terms, geographic queries, or by category; Downloadable mobile applications for enabling users to save lists of events, places, and categories for the purpose of automatically recommending similar places and future events, sharing with other users, and publishing their own curated lists and guides of events and places; Downloadable mobile applications for enabling users to list their events and promote their places and events and derive insights from user-generated data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling users to find local events and places by search terms, geographic queries, or by category; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling users to save lists of events, places, and categories for the purpose of automatically recommending similar places and future events, sharing with other users, and publishing their own curated lists and guides of events and places; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling users to list their events and promote their places and events and derive insights from user-generated data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling customizable routing and way-finding between two or more locations; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for enabling organizations and agencies to collect data, analyze, and derive insights related development planning and policy formulation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |