Drawing for JOI SERVICES

USPTO serial 88594557

JOI SERVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HACK, ANDREA R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JOI SERVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James S. Patterson

James S. Patterson Spencer Fane LLP5700 Granite ParkwaySuite 650Plano, TX 75024

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for coordinating transportation services, namely, downloadable and recorded software for the automated scheduling and dispatch of motorized vehiclesACTIVE—
038telecommunications services, namely, routing calls, SMS messages, and push-notifications to local third-party motorized vehicle dispatchers in the vicinity of the caller using mobile phonesACTIVE—
039providing a website featuring information regarding transportation services and bookings for transportation servicesACTIVE—
042providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for providing transportation services, bookings for transportation services and dispatching motorized vehicles to customersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 6, 2020NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2020TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 6, 2020PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2020PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 3, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 10, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 27, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2019MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2019TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Sep 1, 2019PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance