USPTO serial 88597041
SUGARCUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUGARCUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Kokka
SCOTT S. KOKKA KOKKA & BACKUS, PC550 S. CALIFORNIA AVE.SUITE 300PALO ALTO, CA 94306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Augmented reality software for mobile devices, portable computing devices, tablets, computers, and electronic devices, namely, augmented reality software for integrating electronic data with real world environments for the purpose of rendering wall art décor and design and for providing online retail store services; Computer software for augmented reality displays on computing devices using digitally-generated data combined with imagery of physical spaces for interior design and art; Computer software for measuring, identifying and depicting physical spaces via portable electronic devices; Computer software for creating photorealistic three-dimensional diagrams based on physical spaces for the purpose of rendering wall art décor and design; Computer software for diagraming physical spaces, namely, using device sensor and camera data for the purpose of creating photorealistic three-dimensional diagrams for use in connection with rendering interior design and décor projects; Computer software incorporating geolocation data to gather information concerning the size and dimensions of a location for the purpose of creating a photorealistic three-dimensional diagram; Computer software for the purpose of decorating and designing physical spaces based on measurements obtained via proximity detection; Augmented reality software for integrating electronic data with real world environments to enable virtual reality viewing of environments, rooms, buildings, and 3D drawings therefor for use in connection with interior design and wall art décor and design projects; Computer software for mobile devices to enable users to browse, shop for and make purchases of interior décor and art; Computer software for use in planning and implementing interior and exterior design and decorating; Computer software to enable users to access and utilize online and mobile retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods, home interior and exterior furnishings, products and accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |