USPTO serial 88598763
UTOPIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NODES, CHRISTOPHER JAMES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UTOPIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. McLean
Paul A. McLean GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP1900 UNIVERSITY AVE, 5TH FLOOREAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising, business management, and business administration for startup incubation activities; Incubation services, namely, providing new business venture development and formation consulting services and business development services in the nature of start-up support to early stage startup companies, business management advice, business consulting services in the nature of assistance in development of business strategies and creative ideation, business analysis and business strategic planning services, special event planning for startup business purposes and urban ecosystem business purposes; Business services, namely, incubation services in the nature of providing office space containing business equipment to startups, matching, identifying and securing private investors with entrepreneurs needing funding, business consultation in the nature of assistance with business acquisitions and the development of business strategies, and business strategy consultancy and advisory services; Business consulting services, namely, providing assistance to city leaders and businesses for the purpose of improving cities; all of the foregoing relating to new ventures, urban solutions and startup companies that are focused on making cities better for the many, not just the few, and all of the foregoing to exclude actual real estate development and construction services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2023 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | EXDD | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |