USPTO serial 88600264
MEX MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEX MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER M. TAYLOR
CHRISTOPHER M. TAYLOR HOOPER HATHAWAY, P.C.126 SOUTH MAIN STREETANN ARBOR, MI 48104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcasting services in the nature of transmission of audio-video content, motion pictures, programs, and live-action content distributed via IPTV, OTT, broadcast television, cable television, satellite, mobile wireless networks, internet, and broadband networks; Broadcasting services in the nature of transmission of ongoing programs distributed via via IPTV, OTT, broadcast television, cable television, satellite, mobile wireless networks, internet, and broadband networks | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable motion pictures and continuing television programs in the field of drama, comedy, variety, children's entertainment, reality, documentary, animation, talk shows, news, and general interest distributed via IPTV, OTT, broadcast television, cable television, satellite, mobile wireless networks, internet, and broadband networks; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-ongoing television programs in the fields of movies, films, and motion pictures in the field of drama, comedy, variety, reality, children's entertainment, documentary, animation, talk shows, news, and general interest distributed IPTV, OTT, broadcast television, cable television, satellite, mobile wireless networks, internet, and broadband networks | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |