USPTO serial 88603553
BLACKBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELMAN, JESSE M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLACKBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Leduc County, Alberta, CA
Leduc County, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DARIN M. KLEMCHUK
DARIN M. KLEMCHUK KLEMCHUK PLLC8150 N. CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY10TH FLDALLAS, TX 75206Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for controlling and managing access server applications; downloadable computer application software for mobile phones, namely, downloadable software for identifying the owner of personal items using a unique assigned number; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for identifying the owner of personal items using a unique assigned number for use in database management and electronic storage of data; downloadable decoder software; computer software, namely, downloadable software development tools for the creation of mobile internet applications and client interface | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | Credit card transaction processing services; Cryptocurrency payment processing; electronic funds transfer by telecommunications | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Communicating with sensing devices, namely, wireless broadband communication services using RFID sensors, SONAR devices, RADAR devices, infrared cameras, microphones, stereoscopic cameras, light sensors and pressure sensors, controlling lights, motors, set pieces, cameras, projectors, monitors, sensing devices and also using media servers according to user-selected parameters; Broadcasting services, namely, transmission of advertising programs and media advertising communications via digital communications networks | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Computer software project management services; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in the field of financial services for trading derivatives; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; consultancy in the field of software design; Internet-based application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, analyzing, and maintaining the code, applications, and software for websites of others; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for identifying the owner of personal items using a unique assigned number for use in database management and electronic storage of data; payment gateway services in the nature of providing a website featuring technology that enables users to process credit card payments | ABANDONED | — |
| 045 | Regulatory compliance consulting in the field of licensed reproduction of brands and trademarks; Trademark watch services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Blackbox Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Blackbox Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named BLACKBOX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2025 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2024 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2023 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 4, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2019 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |