USPTO serial 88604071
FLEXPOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERTRAND, JOSEPH A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLEXPOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GABRIELLE S. ROTH
GABRIELLE S. ROTH SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20006United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines designed and manufactured for forming and filling packages and containers used to pack food, liquids, pet food, beverages, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare related products; packaging systems comprised of machines for forming and filling packages and containers, machines for filling packages and containers, flexible film for packaging, semi-rigid plastic film for packaging, semi-rigid plastic and paper packaging for food, pharmaceuticals and liquids, rigid plastic and paper sheets for packaging, packaging materials made from paper, rigid plastic packaging, rigid paper packaging, cups, trays and containers for food, liquids, pet food, beverages, pharmaceuticals, healthcare related products, and industrial applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | rigid plastic and paper sheets for packaging; flexible packaging materials made from synthetic polyofelin films; packaging materials made from paper; semi-rigid plastic film for packaging; semi-rigid paper packaging materials for food, pharmaceuticals, and liquids; semi-rigid plastic film for packaging for food, pharmaceuticals, and liquids; rigid paper packaging containers for food, liquids, pet food, beverages, pharmaceuticals, healthcare related products, and industrial applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | semi-rigid plastic packaging containers for storage or transport of food, pharmaceuticals, and liquids | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | custom fabrication of rigid plastic and paper sheets for packaging, and of rigid plastic packaging, rigid paper packaging, cups, trays and containers for food, liquids, pet food, beverages, pharmaceuticals, healthcare related products, and industrial applications, of flexible packaging materials made from synthetic films, of packaging materials made from paper, of semi-rigid plastic film for packaging and of semi-rigid plastic and paper packaging for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 21, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 18, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |