Drawing for MULTEEZ

USPTO serial 88606855

MULTEEZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULTEEZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIK M. PELTON

ERIK M. PELTON ERIK M. PELTON & ASSOCIATES, PLLC111 PARK PLACE, SUITE 1AFALLS CHURCH, VA 22046UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Homeopathic pharmaceuticals, namely, vitaminsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 11, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 11, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 27, 2021EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 11, 2021RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Feb 19, 2021GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2021GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2021CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 4, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 25, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 6, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 6, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 3, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 8, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 8, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance