Drawing for REALISTIC

USPTO serial 88607264

REALISTIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLLIER, DAVID E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REALISTIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anessa Owen Kramer

Anessa Owen Kramer HONIGIMAN LLP39400 WOODWARD AVENUE, SUITE 101BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cases for cellular phones; Video monitoring and security system comprising a camera for transmitting images and sounds to a remote location; Video monitoring and security system comprising a microphone, a speaker, a doorbell, and a camera for transmitting images and sounds to a remote location; downloadable computer software for home security monitoring; electronic door actuated locks; electronic container actuated locks; drone systems comprising camera drones that enable video capture and video streaming; Components for home security systems, namely, cellular video doorbell, cellular video camera, cellular door electronic actuated locks, cellular container electronic actuated locksACTIVE—
042Non-downloadable software for home security monitoring; Computer services pertaining to home security, namely, providing technology information updates for home security systems via the global computer networkACTIVE—
045Monitoring of security alarms; surveillance servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2024MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2024ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2024EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2024AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 26, 2024EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 26, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 22, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2023EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2023EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 20, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 20, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2023EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2023EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 18, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2022EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2022EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 27, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 1, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 30, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2021XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2021GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2021GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2021CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2020GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 29, 2020GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 11, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance