USPTO serial 88607596
THE UNCOMMON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, ANDREA P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE UNCOMMON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Roy, Esq.
Michael Roy, Esq. FRIDMAN LAW GROUP, PLLC169 BOWERYNEW YORK, NY 10002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | (Based on Intent to Use) Podcasting services; Video broadcasting; Video transmission over digital networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Arranging and conducting special events for social entertainment purposes; Arranging, organizing, conducting, and hosting social entertainment events; Art exhibition services; Conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of art shows, creative technology demonstrations, film festivals, music performances, experiential design demonstrations, podcasts listening parties and readings from written publications; Electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on -line featuring art, creative technology, filmmaking, music and experiential design; Entertainment services in the nature of hosting social entertainment events; Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of art, creative technology, filmmaking, music and experiential design; Entertainment services, namely, providing video podcasts in the field of art, creative technology, filmmaking, music and experiential design; Hosting social entertainment events, namely, intellectual gatherings consisting of artists, creative technologists, filmmakers, musicians and experiential designers, for others; Organizing community festivals featuring primarily intellectual gatherings being social entertainment events consisting of artists, creative technologists, filmmakers, musicians, experiential designers and art exhibitions and also providing podcasts in the fields of art and music; Organizing cultural and arts events; Organizing and hosting of events for cultural purposes; Providing information in the field of creative technology as it relates to filmmaking, music and experiential design art; Publication of printed matter; Publishing of electronic publications | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2019 |
| 042 | Providing information relating to computer technology in the field of creative technology for creating computer special effects, creating computer generated imagery, creating computer generated design, creating computer generated art, and creating computer generated music | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Carty Group LLC
- Other trademarks owned by The Carty Group LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE UNCOMMON
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2022 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2021 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2021 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2021 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2020 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |