USPTO serial 88609006
EZ-ORTHO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EZ-ORTHO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Petersburg, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert W. Larson
Herbert W. Larson LARSON & LARSON, PA11199 69TH STREET NORTHLARGO, FL 33703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer application software for mobile phones and mobile devices namely, software for enabling users to transmit photos, videos, images, text, and other digital data of orthopedic injuries to others via a wireless or cellular network for mobile phones and mobile devices, or the global computer network, all for communicating with orthopedic healthcare providers, accessing medical consultations, diagnoses, and scheduling appointments for medical treatment and advice concerning orthopedic injuries, and providing remote and virtual patient monitoring, preventative care, and generating virtual images and virtual diagnosis with health care providers concerning orthopedic injuries and the convalescence thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing on-line, non-downloadable, Internet-based software application for enabling users to transmit photos, videos, images, text, and other digital data of orthopedic injuries to others via a wireless or cellular network for mobile phones and mobile devices, or the global computer network, all for communicating with orthopedic healthcare providers, accessing medical consultations, diagnoses, and scheduling appointments for medical treatment and advice concerning orthopedic injuries, and providing remote and virtual patient monitoring, preventative care, and generating virtual images and virtual diagnosis with health care providers concerning orthopedic injuries and the convalescence thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |