USPTO serial 88610644
UKAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAN DEN ABEELEN, DEREK C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UKAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ruian City, Zhejiang, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bharati Bakshani
BHARATI BAKSHANI LADAS & PARRY LLP1040 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automobile chassis; Jet engines for land vehicles; Gear boxes for land vehicles; Transmission chains for land vehicles; Torque converters for land vehicles; Transmission shafts for land vehicles; Automobiles; Motorcycles; Hubs for vehicle wheels; Axles for vehicles | ACTIVE | Aug 20, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |