Drawing for RUFF DAYZ

USPTO serial 88610670

RUFF DAYZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ANDREW T
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RUFF DAYZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David P. Johnson

David P. Johnson WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 EAST SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplements for pets, namely, pet chews and pet tinctures; all of the foregoing containing only naturally occurring trace amounts of CBD derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than .03 percent on a dry weight basisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 6, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 11, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 24, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 6, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 10, 2022RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 12, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 7, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 12, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 12, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 14, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance