Drawing for *SERAPHIC

USPTO serial 88614722

*SERAPHIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with *SERAPHIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert D. Michaux

Robert D. Michaux Christian & Barton, LLP901 East Cary Street, Suite 1800Richmond, VA 23219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Medical clinic servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2023MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2023ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2023NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2023DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 16, 2023DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2023ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 3, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2022NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2022DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 16, 2022AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 31, 2022DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2022ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2022PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 6, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 30, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2019NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance