USPTO serial 88619529
TRACK CONTAIN DESTROY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRACK CONTAIN DESTROY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Reynoldsburg, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vanessa Harmon Gouhin
48 KLEMA DRIVE NORTHREYNOLDSBURG, OH 43068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal containers for the storage and transportation of goods | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2016 |
| 009 | provision of secured containers | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2016 |
| 020 | Nonmetal and non-paper containers for storage or transport | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2016 |
| 041 | educational and training services, namely, conducting seminars and training sessions related to data security and regulations | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2016 |
| 042 | data security services, namely, tracking services using technologies such as radio frequency RFID, bar code and global positioning systems of data bearing devices; media sanitization and erasure of all data from data bearing devices; consulting services for security risk assessment and mitigation, including management policy evaluation and development | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2016 |
| 045 | provision of secure transport services of data bearing devices | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TechR2, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named TRACK CONTAIN DESTROY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |