USPTO serial 88619945
R ROXOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, AHSEN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with R ROXOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lian Ernette
Lian Ernette Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.10220 Aristocrat WayLas Vegas, NV 89135United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer game software; downloadable computer game software featuring card games, slot games, video games, gaming, gambling, casino, bingo, poker, instant win, lottery and betting activities; downloadable computer game software and downloadable computer game programs provided via the internet; downloadable computer gaming software for conducting and administering online games, gambling, and competitions; downloadable online game software and game related applications, namely, downloadable computer game programs and downloadable electronic game programs; downloadable interactive video game programs; downloadable interactive entertainment software for use with computers, namely, downloadable computer game software; downloadable electronic publications distributed by electronic mail, namely, books, magazines, manuals, newsletters and articles, all relating to games, card games, slot games, video games, gaming, gambling, casino, bingo, poker, instant win, lottery and betting; all of the foregoing exclusively relating to free to play or real money casino games, games of chance, and gambling games; none of the foregoing relating to entertainment software sold directly to end-users, computer games sold directly to end-users, or video games sold directly to end-users | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2019 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online non-downloadable computer games featuring card games, slot games, video games, bingo games, poker games, instant win games, lottery games and betting games; providing online card games; providing online non-downloadable video games; entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable online games of chance and skill and video games; entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games, enhancements within online computer games, and game applications within online computer games; provision of online non-downloadable electronic publications, namely, books, magazines, manuals, newsletters and articles in the field of games and gambling; providing online non-downloadable news reporting in the field of entertainment, games, slot games, video games, gaming, gambling, casino, bingo, poker, instant win, lottery and betting activities; consultancy services in the field of online computer and video games and gaming services, namely, online computer games, casino games, and gambling; all of the foregoing exclusively relating to free to play or real money casino games, games of chance, and gambling games; none of the foregoing relating to entertainment software sold directly to end-users, computer games sold directly to end-users, or video games sold directly to end-users | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 23, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2025 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 27, 2025 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2025 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 6, 2019 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 6, 2019 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |