USPTO serial 88620381
IT'S HIGH TIME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUSKIN, MATTHEW SEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IT'S HIGH TIME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter W. Becker
Peter W. Becker CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1201 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Non-alcoholic tea-based beverages; beverages, namely, iced tea; tea-based iced beverages; tea-based iced beverages, infused with a cannabinoid, said cannabinoid being derived from hemp, said cannabinoid being hemp-derived cannabidiol (CBD) with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0. 3 percent on a dry weight basis | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non- alcoholic beverages, namely, soft drinks, flavored waters, fruit juice beverages; non-alcoholic beverages, namely, soft drinks, flavored waters, fruit juice beverages infused with a cannabinoid, said cannabinoid being derived from hemp, said cannabinoid being hemp-derived cannabidiol (CBD) with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0. 3 percent on a dry weight basis; non-alcoholic carbonated beverages; non-alcoholic carbonated beverages infused with a cannabinoid, said cannabinoid being derived from hemp, said cannabinoid being hemp-derived cannabidiol (CBD) with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0. 3 percent on a dry weight basis; non-alcoholic beers; non-alcoholic ciders; non-alcoholic cocktail preparations being cocktail mixes; non-alcoholic drinks; energy drinks; energy drinks infused with a cannabinoid, said cannabinoid being derived from hemp, said cannabinoid being hemp derived cannabidiol (CBD) with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration of not more than 0. 3 percent on a dry weight basis; non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |